Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A ym. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial
neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;:CD001318 «PMID: 24302546»PubMed
Berget A, Andreasson B, Bock JE ym. Outpatient treatment of cervical intra-epithelial
neoplasia. The CO2 laser versus cryotherapy, a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol
Scand 1987;66:531-6 «PMID: 3321872»PubMed
Bostofte E, Berget A, Falck Larsen J ym. Conization by carbon dioxide laser or cold
knife in the treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol
Scand 1986;65:199-202 «PMID: 3090849»PubMed
Kristensen GB, Jensen LK, Hølund B. A randomized trial comparing two methods of cold
knife conization with laser conization. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:1009-13 «PMID: 2234708»PubMed
Larsson G, Alm P, Grundsell H. Laser conization versus cold knife conization. Surg
Gynecol Obstet 1982;154:59-61 «PMID: 7053590»PubMed
Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic
review. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1058-62 «PMID: 14672487»PubMed
Santos C, Galdos R, Alvarez M ym. One-Session Management of Cervical Intraepithelial
Neoplasia: A Solution for Developing Countries. A Prospective, Randomized Trial of
LEEP versus Laser Excisional Conization Gynecol Oncol 1996;61:11-5 «PMID: 8812512»PubMed
Alvarez RD, Helm CW, Edwards RP ym. Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser
ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 1994;52:175-9
PubMed
Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M ym. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques
of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 1994;54:175-9 «PMID: 8063242»PubMed